Personalization Headless Runtime

Runtime boundary

The Personalization runtime can decide slots through WordPress helpers, JavaScript APIs, REST endpoints, and headless server-to-server requests. Every path should preserve consent, fallback content, cache compatibility, and data minimization.

Developer API review

Before headless use, verify payload shape, HMAC or authentication expectations, event names, consent state, slot keys, default content, and unavailable-provider behavior. Pair this page with Storefront Panel Consent Review and the headless decision tutorial.

Production standard

Do not send raw customer records, payment context, or sensitive traits to decide endpoints when a visitor ID, segment, locale, or cart-safe summary is enough.

Quick reference

• Use this page when assigning owners, review paths, privacy decisions, high-risk approvals, client reporting, or incident expectations.
• Do not treat this page as legal, accounting, security, or compliance advice; route sensitive decisions to the qualified owner.

Scope limits

• This page does not replace legal, privacy, accounting, security, or client-contract authority.
• Use it to identify the accountable owner and evidence needed before sensitive work proceeds.

Owner and cadence

• Primary owner: account owner, agency lead, privacy owner, or operations lead depending on risk area.
• Review cadence: monthly, after incidents, after staff changes, and before client or stakeholder reporting.
• Escalate when ownership, approval, privacy, backup, audit, or client-reporting decisions are unclear.

Access and data boundary

• Give privacy, approval, backup, offboarding, high-risk commerce, and client-reporting decisions to named owners with authority over those risks.
• Minimize and redact evidence before screenshots, exports, client reports, support bundles, or audit extracts leave the responsible team.

Production checklist

• Assign a named owner and define the production impact before rollout.
• Capture validation, support, and rollback notes in the same place operators already review SophMate work.
• Assign owners for approval policy, audit review, retention, privacy handling, backup validation, and support escalation.
• Keep governance decisions visible in onboarding notes so agencies, developers, support leads, and store owners do not invent separate rules.

Acceptance checks

• The guidance can be repeated by a second operator.
• The work has a clear escalation path when it affects customers, money, content, settings, privacy, or workflow execution.
• A reviewer can identify the accountable owner for customer, commerce, theme, privacy, and provider decisions.
• The team has a repeatable monthly review for budgets, audit events, permissions, retention, and unresolved incidents.

Failure modes to test

• Test missing reviewer authority, incomplete audit records, privacy redaction mistakes, failed backup restore, offboarding gaps, and high-risk WooCommerce changes.
• Confirm governance-sensitive work stops until the accountable owner records the decision and evidence.

Evidence to capture

• Record owner, policy decision, risk level, affected users or workflows, audit trail location, and next review date.
• Capture redaction review for screenshots, diagnostics, support bundles, client reports, and exported artifacts.

Decision record

• Record the governance decision, accountable risk owner, affected users or workflows, policy source, reviewer authority, audit location, and next review date.
• Include privacy, legal, revenue, client-reporting, backup, offboarding, or high-risk WooCommerce implications where they apply.

Stop or rollback path

Pause governance-sensitive work until ownership, privacy, audit, and review cadence are clear.

Monitoring window

• Monitor audit records, access changes, privacy requests, approval volume, and client/reporting feedback after each governance change.
• Review unresolved decisions in the next monthly governance cycle or sooner for high-risk workflows.

Expansion criteria

• Expand governance policy only after owners, evidence, audit trail, privacy impact, client communication, and review cadence are clear.
• The policy can be enforced by roles, approvals, documentation, and support routines instead of memory.

Common mistakes

• Treating governance as a one-time setup task instead of a recurring review of roles, budgets, approvals, retention, and audit records.
• Sharing diagnostics, screenshots, or client reports before removing secrets and unrelated private data.

Common questions

What is the main decision this page supports?

The page helps the team decide whether ownership, evidence, access, failure handling, monitoring, and rollback are clear enough for production use.

Who should own this decision?

The accountable risk owner should own the decision: privacy, store operations, agency account lead, site owner, or support lead depending on scope.

What should stop the rollout?

Stop when reviewer authority, privacy impact, audit trail, backup, access, or customer-visible risk is unclear.

Related operations

• Return to SophMate Documentation.
• Use Diagnostics and Support for support evidence.
• Use Backup and Staging Workflow before high-risk changes.
• Use Regulated Claims and Legal Review before publishing sensitive claims.
• Use Access Offboarding and Seat Review after staff, contractor, or agency changes.
• Use Privacy and Data Retention before sharing support evidence.
• Use Privacy Export and Erase Requests before handling requester data.
• Use WooCommerce High-Risk Actions before store-changing work.